Why We Don't Kiss the Rings of Catholic Bishops
A (Major, and, um, Obvious) Reason Catholic Leadership Faces Skepticism
I am fearful that my repeated examination of Harrison Butker’s commencement address at Benedictine College on May 11 might be growing tedious. I have other things to write about, and I’m concerned at this point you would probably have me move on. I will. I promise. But Harrison said a lot, and I haven’t evicted his words from my brain yet.
Today, I offer some thoughts about why it might be difficult for people to place their trust in Catholic Church leadership in the way they once did. First, a portion of Mr. Butker’s speech:
Our bishops once had adoring crowds of people kissing their rings and taking in their every word, but now relegate themselves to a position of inconsequential existence. Now, when a bishop of a diocese or the bishop's conference as a whole puts out an important document on this matter or that, nobody even takes a moment to read it, let alone follow it.
No. Today, our shepherds are far more concerned with keeping the doors open to the chancery than they are with saying the difficult stuff out loud. It seems that the only time you hear from your bishops is when it's time for the annual appeal, whereas we need our bishops to be vocal about the teachings of the Church, setting aside their own personal comfort and embracing their cross. Our bishops are not politicians but shepherds, so instead of fitting in the world by going along to get along, they too need to stay in their lane and lead.
-Harrison Butker
One Sunday morning not long ago - in fact just a couple weeks after Harrison delivered his speech - I was sitting in a pew awaiting the beginning of mass. As we sat, an unassuming form could be seen walking onto the platform. In the low light, the sheen of a white robe seemed to glow from their shoulders. The spotlights on another part of the platform grew stronger and we saw a woman at the lectern.
In a couple of quick sentences she explained the Archdiocese of Baltimore had issued a letter from Bishop Lori to parishioners, and that the letter was to be read by the parish priests before mass. As she completed her short explanation of the change in pre-mass format, the lights which had been on her dimmed, and the lights above the person in white grew bright and illuminated us all as to who it was.
Father Michael White stood before us with paper in hand, looking miserable. As a moderately recent attender at a Catholic church, I was unfamiliar with the robe he was wearing, which was the whitest of whites, yet understated and humble. It was the kind of white robe I used to imagine angels wearing when I was a child.
Father Michael is a somewhat diminutive man when in full health, probably around 5 feet 8 or so inches tall, and of slight build. I’m not sure of his age, but I’d place him somewhere around his late 60’s, perhaps his early 70’s. In recent months it’s become clear he’s been fighting a health issue - sciatica, I’ve been told - and standing is difficult for him. When he delivers his homily he sits on a stool, a cup of water hidden at the ready behind the lectern for what has become an inevitable dry throat coughing spell as he delivers his message.
I like Father Michael. He seems a genuine person. From the seat where I observe him, he appears to be humble with a heart for his church and its people. When he struggles to get through his message, we struggle with him. As he does his best to control his coughing we congregants can be heard clearing our throats throughout the seats in hopes we’re somehow helping, or at least giving him permission to cough as need be.
But as he stood there robed in white before mass even began, it seemed his discomfort wasn’t related to his health. I can’t be sure. I don’t know the man the way I most certainly would know the preacher at past evangelical churches I’ve attended, but my sense was that he didn’t want to be reading the letter he was holding. It seemed to cause him distress. Nonetheless, Catholic Church hierarchy demanded the letter be read, so read it he did.
It was addressing an announcement the Archdiocese of Baltimore had made about churches that would be closing. The closings are the result of the “Seek the City to Come” initiative, a study to see how the Archdiocese of Baltimore can have an effective ministry moving into the future. The obvious implication is that the current operation isn’t effective. The money to sustain the current reality just isn’t there. In an effort to alleviate the financial pressures, the number of parishes will be reduced from 61 to 30.
I’m sure Bishop Lori was hoping the letter would do something to alleviate distress about church closings. I wasn’t experiencing distress, so to speak. Our parish church is thriving and might be considered a mega-mass. If that word makes you think “Mega-church,” then it has done its job. Nativity Church is one of the most evangelical experiences you could ever have at a Catholic mass.1
There’s an elephant in the room when it comes to the church closings. The elephant is named, “Clergy Sexual Abuse Scandal.” In September of 2023, the archdiocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as the direct result of the scandal. The previous sentence is a lesson in over-simplification. You can find some clarification here. But for me, and scores of others like me, the assumption is that the church closings and the bankruptcy are related. Archbishop Lori insists they are not. From the letter:
Many will suspect that these mergers are related to the Chapter 11 Reorganization filing undertaken by the archdiocese. I assure you; they are not.
Lori goes on to explain that money from future sales of church properties will remain with the parish, and will not be used for settlements with victims of clergy sex abuse. According to the letter, “This is Church law, and it is supported by civil law.”
Fine. But, uh, still...
Let’s back up a bit and remember something important.
For decades Catholic priests and brothers2 engaged in sexual abuse and molestation of people in its community, mostly children. Church procedure stipulated that claims of sexual abuse be handled by bishops. In Baltimore, over the span of an 80-year period there were more than 600 claims of abuse against more than 150 priests. Baltimore wasn’t alone. In Boston, one priest alone had 130 claims against him. He was simply shuffled from parish to parish. The pattern was: Abuse → Allegation → Cover-up.
Sure, it was not all priests, and it was not all Bishops. But it was a widespread, diabolical, country-wide3 failure of church leadership to protect its most vulnerable people - children.
I can’t disagree with Butker’s statement about bishops seeming to have an inconsequential existence. I just think he’s not considering the reasons for the current situation. When church leadership operates in ways that perpetuates child sexual abuse, it loses credibility. It’s the the whole “fool me once…” paradigm. It’s a trust issue. How are parishioners expected to place trust in a document as important, when the people who used to write those documents forgot or ignored what was really important?
The health, safety and wellbeing of children.
It’s somewhat baffling that someone would expect to go back to ring-kissing in light of decades of abuse.
Thanks for reading! The most effective way to help others find my writing is to share this article with your friends and family.
If you missed them, here are the first two articles I offered in response to Mr. Butcker’s speech.
When Father Michael first arrived at Nativity Church it was struggling. Frustrated, Father Michael looked to other religious leaders for advice. He and his associate pastor got on a flight to southern California to a conference at the protestant, evangelical mega-church Saddleback Church. Saddleback is the church led by Pastor Rick Warren who authored both Purpose-Driven Life and Purpose-Driven Church. They applied his expert knowledge to Nativity Church and experienced a turnaround. Father Michael and Pastor Warren remain good friends, and Father Michael has authored several books in the fashion of Warren’s Purpose Driven series.
Other people of leadership in the church laity.
The lack of care of children within the Catholic Church is mind-blowing, and I say this as someone who taught for a Catholic School Board for 30 years. The Church wanted us to “indoctrinate” our little students into becoming obedient little lifelong Catholics but never gave a penny to our schools. Everytime we had a hostile gov’t, the Church took the side of the politicians not the side of the educators! And when schools owned by the diocese were blatantly unsafe and in need of repair, they refuse to repair them because the cathedral renovation needed to be paid for first. Let God protect the lives of the children, it wasn’t their job! In Canada, add to that how only the RC church refused to pay their reparations to the fund for Indigenous children who attended residential schools. And can I point out that only the RC residential schools had electric chairs? They had a low electrical charge in which a dampened child would be placed for being “disobedient”, like crying out when being whipped or sexually abused. When I retired, the first thing I did was switch my tax support to the public schools. (Catholic schools here are funded by tax money) I had had enough.
That being said, there have been some amazingly kind and supportive priests and nuns along the way. They have been just as angry at the abuse. One, who was regional head of his order, was informed by police that one of his priests had a complaint against him for sexual abuse of a child. He spoke with the priest, not under confession. The priest admitted he had done it and the regional head immediately removed him from the order, started the process of defrocking him, told him to pack his bags and figure out how to find his own lawyer. But he is the only one I know of who has ever done this.
As for clergy “keeping to their lane”, being politically involved IS keeping to their lane. It’s all part of social justice and sticking up for the poor and vulnerable.
I no longer attend the RC church because they refuse to live up to their formal apologies. They are hypocrites in their official stances and they pressure the best of their priests to live according to that hypocrisy. This is very long, but one more story…
Canadian bishops put out horrific letters too. Years ago they put out a terrible one against the LGBTQ community. About 2 years later they put out another terrible one on marriage, basically saying women should stay in abusive marriages because they had taken the vows, they must live. Nothing about men stopping the abuse. At the time I had a wonderful Dutch priest, about 80 yrs old, had lived his childhood in Holland in WWII, knew hardship and abuse from the Nazis, displacement camps, etc. He, too, was expected to read these letters. The weekend of the marriage letter he simply said, “There is a letter from the bishops on marriage at the back. If you care to read it, go ahead, I don’t particularly recommend it. And after that letter about gays, I am certainly not going to read it out loud!” Our congregation, a mix of farmers and highly placed government officials, loved him all the more for it.
Oh, another note:In the Canadian military, the Catholic priest chaplains have to bring in civilian priests on weekend when Bishop letters are released because they so often break our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the padre could be arrested for hate speech!